Gunna depend on the offset, I run 18x8.5 with 255 tires, the closest point is at the rim and strut, very little clearance, like just a few mm, but no signs of rubbing after a season. A 9” 18 is probably going to need less offset.
Gunna depend on the offset, I run 18x8.5 with 255 tires, the closest point is at the rim and strut, very little clearance, like just a few mm, but no signs of rubbing after a season. A 9” 18 is probably going to need less offset.
OEM setups are often way too far towards understeer, and cars this heavy need a good amount of rubber underfoot IMO. I like the setup. But the clearance at the strut is the key and there isn’t much. I was sticking a mirror back there to see and maybe less than 10mm, but no rubbing evident. Wider rim is tricky up front, but I wanted square for rotating.
Right, because everyone is driving through 2 feet of snow.
While if you are driving through a lot of new snow, skinnier does penetrate more, it works against you for traction in other situations, which you are likely encountering more of the time, where contact area is the important factor. If we were talking a subaru cross-trek or pickup truck, ok, but if you are driving through that kind of snow, your stinger is a snow-plow now. The idea that you need 205s or whatever is a bit ridiculous. He'll be fine with 245 in the winter, that's what I had as my winter setup on my BMW 4 series, through snow, ice and every possible iteration. I'm on 225s right now for winter, but that's just because it's what I had lying around.
Right, because everyone is driving through 2 feet of snow.
While if you are driving through a lot of new snow, skinnier does penetrate more, it works against you for traction in other situations, which you are likely encountering more of the time, where contact area is the important factor. If we were talking a subaru cross-trek or pickup truck, ok, but if you are driving through that kind of snow, your stinger is a snow-plow now. The idea that you need 205s or whatever is a bit ridiculous. He'll be fine with 245 in the winter, that's what I had as my winter setup on my BMW 4 series, through snow, ice and every possible iteration. I'm on 225s right now for winter, but that's just because it's what I had lying around.
I didn't say goto 205s just not 255s like were mentioned. 225s are fine for winter, depth of snow doesn't matter, to be honest i mostly run narrow for ice, slush, and backed up drainage which I encounter far more than straight up snow where hydroplaning is a bigger concern.
I didn't say goto 205s just not 255s like were mentioned. 225s are fine for winter, depth of snow doesn't matter, to be honest i mostly run narrow for ice, slush, and backed up drainage which I encounter far more than straight up snow where hydroplaning is a bigger concern.
Where were 255s mentioned for winter? But even then, it's not like 255s will somehow cause you winter problems, in fact, in many winter situations, you'll be better off. Narrower may penetrate snow, but in many other conditions you'll notice that it's easy to overpower narrow or break traction, which is what you want to avoid at all costs. Yes, wider will hydroplane easier, but 255 winter or AS tires don't hydroplane easily. You need something like a summer racing tire to hydroplane bad. My PS4S is much better in the rain/wet than my Supercar 3s were, in 305 size. Those are out at the extreme. I just don't see any real benefit from going narrower other than to have easily rotatable (square) setups and so on. At these widths, the tire itself is more important than 225 vs 255 IME.
Where were 255s mentioned for winter? But even then, it's not like 255s will somehow cause you winter problems, in fact, in many winter situations, you'll be better off. Narrower may penetrate snow, but in many other conditions you'll notice that it's easy to overpower narrow or break traction, which is what you want to avoid at all costs. Yes, wider will hydroplane easier, but 255 winter or AS tires don't hydroplane easily. You need something like a summer racing tire to hydroplane bad. My PS4S is much better in the rain/wet than my Supercar 3s were, in 305 size. Those are out at the extreme. I just don't see any real benefit from going narrower other than to have easily rotatable (square) setups and so on. At these widths, the tire itself is more important than 225 vs 255 IME.
Personally I don't see a benefit to running wider tires than stock in winter either. But yes quality tires for the conditions make the most difference. Traction hasn't been a problem for me in winter with my 235 square setup. Although, I did want 225s they weren't available at the time.
Here is where 255 was mentioned (I never said it was you that mentioned it):
Personally I don't see a benefit to running wider tires than stock in winter either. But yes quality tires for the conditions make the most difference. Traction hasn't been a problem for me in winter with my 235 square setup. Although, I did want 225s they weren't available at the time.
I don't remember it too looking bad. I was more concerned about having the extra traction and more meat on the tires for winter, obviously with Blizzaks it has almost an "off-road" look with the tread but I wasn't concerned about looks. I actually think it looks better than having the stock 19s. The wheels are a really nice match for the Pantera metal. The 18s do look a bit small on there but if they made the same wheels in a stock 19" staggered configuration I'd go with them over the stock wheels.
View attachment 2209
I went with Blizzaks mounted on 18” fastwheels FC04s in titanium colour... I think it looks ok... I was thinking the titanium colour best matched the dark chrome accents...