Daniel @ K8 Stinger Store
Authorized Vendor
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2017
- Messages
- 2,091
- Reaction score
- 752
- Points
- 118
You also have to realize the vehicles air enters through the turbo right after this then gets cooled via the intercooler.If you noticed the K&N intake is open to the engine bay. Our current setup is drawing air into the boxes from outside the car. Yes you get more air flow with the aftermarket but it's not cold air. Im waiting for someone to crecre a aftermarket true cold air intake then I'll go with that one .
Do you think a CAI is going to matter pulling in any temperature of air if its going to be heated in the turbo? This has been debating so many times and I think if you were making this arguement with an N/A engine then you'd be onto something. IMO I dont think a CAI will make a different and the increase in volume of air is fine (although pulling from the engine bay) regardless of its temperature.
I agree with this ^^I think the stock vs. SRI vs. CAI debate was more valid a few years ago, and only with naturally aspirated engines. With newer high performance vehicles the stock airbox is usually well designed providing adequate air flow. K&N is claiming 9 HP with their SRI, and it does say results may vary. I'm skeptical you gain anything. For SRI vs. CAI there might be a small difference in immediate intake temperature. However, in a forced induction engine you have an intercooler that is efficient at cooling air so I doubt there is any difference in air temperature once it goes through the intercooler. You also run a higher risk of hydrolocking your engine with a CAI in rainy weather. I think stock airbox probably does a good enough job, SRI is nice if you want a bit more sound and a nice look, and CAI is not worth the risk.