Oil Catch Cans - Another Side To The Saga

Sounds great. Will get one and add it in. This doesn't increase the chances with voiding wanted for the engine does it? I know they have to prove it and all but some dealerships Ive been too are pretty anal about things.

If you're worried, ask your Service Manager about it. I'm sure he'll give you a vague response but it may give you some comfort. I know many Audi/VW owners who have them and VAG are sticklers about warranty. Did not hear of anyone have issues with catch cans and VAG engine warranty.
 
Wan El Guapo:
My post is truly an opinion. Facts vs. opinions are for those who care, to decipher. In the oil catch can topic, as I see it, here are some facts;
* catch cans were NOT engineered into the Kia Stinger design. * Oil catch cans DO catch oil. * oil catch cans will cost the consumer additional money. * oil catch cans are NOT installed by authorized Kia dealerships and WILL void the vehicles mechanical warranty * oil catch cans MAY somehow lesson or alleviate a problem that has been perceived yet not proven (at least with this engine). I’m sure there are more as well.

Fact is, WE can prove all day long this chip or that exhaust will make your Stinger faster/louder and so much more. Even more than it was designed to be. WE can back these facts with quarter mile run sheets and dyno results. This can and will continue...

My post is because I’m finally settling in with why I bought this car to begin with. It’s design is excellent. It’s look is flattering. And it’s likelihood of safe/reliable performance is almost assured by Kia’s exceptional warranty (vs. other manufactures). The kid in me starts falling by way of this re-engineering and race/performance stuff.... and sometimes, the maturity sets in and I start thinking things through. I’m jUst trying to remind the folks out there, there’s much more to this than on the surface. It’s OK to like the Stinger for what it is - an awesome GT car.

On the downside, the parent/grandparent in me fears the day I read a headline where some Stinger owner racing on the streets hurts themselves or even worse, someone innocent. I’m just a bit tired of seeing this forum turning more and more into a “I Beat This” or “I raced This” spot. Maybe I’m too old.... too mature... or have finally stopped in the “I’ve got a bigger ____ game. Once again - purely my opinion.

To all my fellow Stinger owners; drive proud - drive safe.... and drive with a smile. Cheers, db
Great post and l agree 100%...l bought my Stinger for the looks...Equipment...Style and most importantly SAFETY...after all in Australia speed limits are pretty low 100-110kph...as for catch cans the have their place but most of the drivers wont be running big boost or even on max boost ..especially in city traffic etc..:thumbup:
 
Wan El Guapo:
My post is truly an opinion. Facts vs. opinions are for those who care, to decipher. In the oil catch can topic, as I see it, here are some facts;
* catch cans were NOT engineered into the Kia Stinger design.

True. Why? Good question. GDI engines in particular are susceptible to build-up in the intake systems (particularly around intake valves) because they inject the fuel directly into the cylinder rather than into the intake airstream, and there's no flow of fuel over the valve stems/seats/etc to wash them clean and cool them (hotter components lead to more oil burn-on) as there is in a port-injected engine.

Untitled-1.jpg


I suspect the reason (opinion) they're not in the design is that they add cost and complexity to the design for an issue that Kia don't consider to be something likely to bite them within the warranty period (or that the cost of engineering and including into the design would cost more than remediating the issues caused by not having one). It's very often all about compromise.

* Oil catch cans DO catch oil.

Well designed ones do, yes, and how much they catch depends on how well they're designed. Then you have the difference between a catch-can (that captures the oil and requires draining) and an AOS that generally captures the oil but delivers it back to the sump.

* oil catch cans will cost the consumer additional money.

In what way exactly? Yes, they cost money to buy (so there's a sticker price) and potentially to install.

They're not removing any more oil from the sump than is already being removed by blow-by/etc, so adding a catch-can won't increase your oil consumption (and an AOS that returns oil from the sump may actually reduce it). They're potentially saving the consumer money by (potentially) avoiding issues with oil deposits in the intake tract (a known issue for GDI engines without catch-cans/AOSs) - resolving that issue definitely costs money, so a catch-can/AOS can actually save money here.

* oil catch cans are NOT installed by authorized Kia dealerships and WILL void the vehicles mechanical warranty

I cannot agree here. Some dealerships WILL install them. Adding a catch-can (or AOS) can only void warranty for an issue directly impacted by the installation of the catch-can/AOS. Kia cannot refuse a warranty claim where the catch-can or AOS did not contribute to the failure.

The notion that having a fully functional item added to a car that causes no direct issues can completely void the entire mechanical warranty on a vehicle is ridiculous.

* oil catch cans MAY somehow lesson or alleviate a problem that has been perceived yet not proven (at least with this engine). I’m sure there are more as well.

The fact that catch-cans are catching oil at all is proof that they're doing something - there's no place for oil in the inlet system of an engine (GDI or otherwise) - if it did, they'd inject it there on purpose. Oil ends up in the intake system of engines as a byproduct of compromises in engine design and engineering - it's possible to stop it (or reduce it), but the cost of doing so (in terms of efficiency, engineering efforts, etc) is substantial.

It's well know that oil in the intake system causes build-ups of burned residue, it's well established that the issue is worse in direct-injected engines, and the cost of remediation of such issues is significant (often requiring the pulling down of the entire intake side of the engine and cleaning/replacing of parts - assuming it doesn't cause other issues such as component failure due to a number of likely scenarios. It's also well established that the oil that doesn't build up inside the inlet system can only go one place - the combustion chamber, and it's known to have a negative impact on the efficiency of the combustion process (it effectively lowers the octane level of the combustion charge, meaning hotter and less well controlled combustion, requiring pulling back of timing resulting in less power being produced).

Fact is, WE can prove all day long this chip or that exhaust will make your Stinger faster/louder and so much more. Even more than it was designed to be. WE can back these facts with quarter mile run sheets and dyno results. This can and will continue...

Yes - and these things generally adjust the level of compromise made in the design of the car (almost all engineering is about compromise).

My post is because I’m finally settling in with why I bought this car to begin with. It’s design is excellent. It’s look is flattering. And it’s likelihood of safe/reliable performance is almost assured by Kia’s exceptional warranty (vs. other manufactures). The kid in me starts falling by way of this re-engineering and race/performance stuff.... and sometimes, the maturity sets in and I start thinking things through. I’m jUst trying to remind the folks out there, there’s much more to this than on the surface. It’s OK to like the Stinger for what it is - an awesome GT car.

On the downside, the parent/grandparent in me fears the day I read a headline where some Stinger owner racing on the streets hurts themselves or even worse, someone innocent. I’m just a bit tired of seeing this forum turning more and more into a “I Beat This” or “I raced This” spot. Maybe I’m too old.... too mature... or have finally stopped in the “I’ve got a bigger ____ game. Once again - purely my opinion.

To all my fellow Stinger owners; drive proud - drive safe.... and drive with a smile. Cheers, db

Little argument from me on this last stuff. It's clearly a good car - it "has good bones". The Stinger does an exceptional job as it comes from the factory, and for the vast majority of owners, probably requires no adjustment.

But it isn't perfect, and for some, the compromises that Kia decided to make don't suit their requirements, and so they choose to adjust. More power to them.

I'm not big on the "I chopped this" threads, or the "Who has the most HP/kW/bigger e-peen" threads - but that's fine, I simply avoid becoming a competitor in them. For others who love them, great - as long as they're being safe and sensible, it's not my place to tell them how to live their lives or what's important to them to be happy.
 
______________________________
Manaz: Nice reply. Thanks for the time spent. Some things to ponder for certain. MY Stinger doesn’t need to go faster.. or be quicker off the line. I’d just like mine to last as long as it can... and remain a safe, fun, reliable car.
 
Damn it Manaz, I was all set on skipping the OCC then you had to go and make all that sense!
Now I have to explain to my wife why I'm spending another $300 on the Stinger this month :)
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Damn it Manaz, I was all set on skipping the OCC then you had to go and make all that sense!
Now I have to explain to my wife why I'm spending another $300 on the Stinger this month :)

Definitely worth the insurance, something fairly cheap, easy install, easy to keep up with.

Check these out from BMS, maintenance free, decent price:

BMS Stinger Zero Maintenance OCC
 
I love a great engineering thread that won't die! Well spoken Manaz!!

On the question of whether Oil Catch Cans are 'needed' or not, the proof is in the pudding (or the captured sludge, as it were). If ANY oil / moisture is captured in the can, this is gunk which will NOT recirculate back into your engine and carbonize on intake valves. Since engines are designed to suck clean / dry air (not oily gunk), how can that not be a big WIN?

Reminds me of the never-ending magnetic drain plug debate? If ANY metal 'fuzz' is captured on the magnet (seen at fluid changes), that is abrasive stuff NO one wants circulating through their lubricant between oil changes. Another big WIN!

Funny, with all the mods people spend huge $$$ on, these two relatively inexpensive items could be the most important for longevity of our autos?
 
I've been on the fence about getting an OCC for the Stinger since my purchase a year ago. I think the decision I've made is that it's unlikely I will keep the car longer than 5 years, and I barely put 10,000kms on a year, so the negative effects of carbon caked intake valves won't be in full swing when I get rid of the car.

When I was heavily debating, I spent a good amount of time trying to research definitive conclusions on whether a catch can has any evidence of working, and how well they work. I could not find any real in depth analysis that could prove or disprove the effectiveness. It's hard to also use a sample size since mileage may vary between users for a plethora of reasons. It seems a good number of the VAG guys with DI engines (GTI's and whatnot) were still seeing carbon caked valves even when running an OCC, so I never did come to a conclusion to whether the OCC does work (well) or not, it was not a universal win from what I found. Either way, still inconclusive until proven otherwise, for me. The theory is sound, but the evidence just isn't there yet.
 
Wan El Guapo: excellent video. Thanks for that.
Volvowith18psi: maybe our representative from Kia of Muncie (or some other dealership) can chime in on install and warranty. I'll certainly check with my local Kia dealer.
My personal opinion on this: it can't hurt our vehicles to install a OCC, UNLESS, it somehow voids or impacts the mechanical warranty.
Good point. I am curious to see more "data" on his statements.
 
Here is a picture from my Mishimoto CC I had in my Optima Hybrid. You can see the layers.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150120_152043 (1)~2.webp
    IMG_20150120_152043 (1)~2.webp
    196 KB · Views: 46
______________________________
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Is there a benefit to have 2 catch cans instead of one. I have read that only having one works only when the car is Idling and not when throttle is open like in day to day or highway driving.
 
Is there a benefit to have 2 catch cans instead of one. I have read that only having one works only when the car is Idling and not when throttle is open like in day to day or highway driving.
During high throttle the blowby has to vent out through the fresh air plumbing. Having a catch can on that side will help pull out any oil that may be in those vapors.
Air is pulled through the PCV any time there is a vacuum in the manifold, which is any time the throttle is less than 30%-ish.
 
Just wanted to add that the main reason catch cans aren't standard on DI engines is the upkeep. How quickly they accumulate crud varies a lot, depending on driving style and other conditions. Unlike other standard maintenance that can be scheduled with long intervals between upkeep/inspection, the catch can will need to be frequently monitored or risk having it fill, which then leads to sending the crud into the system defeating its very purpose. Car makers are lucky people ever change the oil and plugs, let alone checking a catch can every few thousand miles.

Their existence isn't mandatory for a DI engine to operate, and the issues may not present themselves until warranty has expired. So it's unlikely we'll ever see them commonplace on engines especially with EVs looming on the horizon.
 
Just wanted to add that the main reason catch cans aren't standard on DI engines is the upkeep. How quickly they accumulate crud varies a lot, depending on driving style and other conditions. Unlike other standard maintenance that can be scheduled with long intervals between upkeep/inspection, the catch can will need to be frequently monitored or risk having it fill, which then leads to sending the crud into the system defeating its very purpose. Car makers are lucky people ever change the oil and plugs, let alone checking a catch can every few thousand miles.

Their existence isn't mandatory for a DI engine to operate, and the issues may not present themselves until warranty has expired. So it's unlikely we'll ever see them commonplace on engines especially with EVs looming on the horizon.
The only time you would have an issue is in winter. They accumulate condensation. For me it is no big deal having to empty it once a week, 5 min job. By then it's usually half full with water. Otherwise once the temperature is above the freezing again, I could go months not having to empty.
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
The only time you would have an issue is in winter. They accumulate condensation. For me it is no big deal having to empty it once a week, 5 min job. By then it's usually half full with water. Otherwise once the temperature is above the freezing again, I could go months not having to empty.
Yup, It Just Depends. Where, precisely, the can is located can also have a big effect. Get it tucked in close to the engine and water will boil off easier. I just put a Crawford can on my wife's Subaru and that's their approach - get it in close to the head and the engine will keep it warm.
And which oil you run! I switched to Redline and now only get 1 tbsp of oil every 2,000 miles or so. Don't even need to empty it between oil changes.
 
______________________________
The only time you would have an issue is in winter. They accumulate condensation. For me it is no big deal having to empty it once a week, 5 min job. By then it's usually half full with water. Otherwise once the temperature is above the freezing again, I could go months not having to empty.
I think you missed the point of my post (?). The average car owner wouldn't and couldn't be bothered, hence why it's only an aftermarket thing [answering the original post].
 
Yup, It Just Depends. Where, precisely, the can is located can also have a big effect. Get it tucked in close to the engine and water will boil off easier. I just put a Crawford can on my wife's Subaru and that's their approach - get it in close to the head and the engine will keep it warm.
And which oil you run! I switched to Redline and now only get 1 tbsp of oil every 2,000 miles or so. Don't even need to empty it between oil changes.
My can gets nice and toasty. It's just in the winter with temps below zero, as the engine cools your going to get condensation build up in the can. Spring through Fall no issues. I use Quaker State Ultimate Durability Synthetic. With my ADD W1 OCC(cleaned out), I use the dipstick hole to inject CRC Intake, Turbo Cleaner when I do it. Just wish they would come up with an adapter that could thread in for spraying. You can really feel the heat given of by the engine as you inject the cleaner.20220114_113718.jpg20210824_082945.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think you missed the point of my post (?). The average car owner wouldn't and couldn't be bothered, hence why it's only an aftermarket thing [answering the original post].
Actually I didn't. As I said, the only time till becomes an issue is in the winter. From Spring to fall I would say you could easily go between oil changes if not longer and have the dealer empty it as part of the oil change service.

Well car companies install them? Highly doubt it. Guess it's easier to just introduce an extra injector behind the valves like some have done. You are correct that you should not see any issues till after the warranty period has ended, maybe even longer, but for us car enthusiasts we don't want to take the chance.
 
...I would say you could easily go between oil changes if not longer and have the dealer empty it as part of the oil change service.
It needs to be more exact then maybe and sometimes for engineers to reliably implement something. There's just too much variability and indifferent/clueless car owners, and sometimes equally clueless service departments, to make catch cans viable widescale.

Add to all this, EVs are coming and there's zero chance catch cans will ever be mainstream between now and then.

Again, this isn't about whether me or you should do it. I'm answering the first post and subsequent posts about why it has not been incorporated into existing engine designs. We don't need to have a back and forth unless you think that it can/should be, in which case see my recent replies.
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Back
Top