I just got back from a dealership who talked me out of trying the lease buyout in Ohio. A few of the things they said:
"Nobody would buy a car if lease buyouts worked"
"Lease cash is not the same as a rebate... they use it to work the numbers in different ways"
"XXX's son leased a GT2 Stinger 10 months ago - look how large his payoff still is"
"You'll end up paying a lot more doing the lease. I don't want to sell you the car if that's the route you want to take."
"We pay the invoice price and can't discount below that on a lease"
"You have a high value trade & lots of equity... buying is better for you" (maybe this is true?)
They are giving me $47K trade allowance on which I owe $19,342. If anyone can please tell me what my better deal is... if buying is actually better than the lease option, or if this dealer is full of crap, please let me know. I tried posting pictures, but can't at this time.
Lease---
MSRP: $54,435
Invoice: $51,679 (selling price of car - they seemed firm on this, not going below invoice)
$10,200 lease cash + $400 military cash
Cap cost: $41,079
MF .00263, 24mo./12k mi., residual: $28,850/70.25%
$2,657.33 down
$708.02/mo lease payment
Buyout info they used detailed further down
Purchasing instead of leasing---
$49,935 selling price (maybe more wiggle room as they offered me maybe $15K or $16K OTD before I left)
$2,750 KMF rebate, $2,000 loyalty rebate, $400 military rebate: $5,150 total rebates
Vehicle total after rebates: $45,283 incl. the little bit of fees & tax
($3,173 in tax savings from the trade worth mentioning)
Balance due: $17,626 (but again, they may go down to $15K or $16K)
Their explanation for why this is a bad idea---
They used an example of making 3 payments! before buying out the lease. Fine, whatever.
~$2,100 in payments + ~$2,700 down = ~$4,800 paid before buyout (their math)
$28,850.55 (residual value) + $300 buyout fee = $29,150.55
$29,150+$14,175 (21 months of $670 payments - apparently he thinks each payment is only ~$30 savings in rent/interest) - this is probably where they went wrong.
=$43,325 + taxes = $46,249 (they said Ohio doesn't tax credit trade for lease, but the Ohio tax website mentions they do, just not how?)
$46,249 + ~$4,800 (from earlier, paid before the buyout as payments & money down)
Grand lease buyout total of $51,049 vs $45,283 to purchase outright... but let's assume their "rent" savings was off. I'm not sure how this figure should be calculated, but using $44,000 as the rough "loan" amount over 24 months at 5.664% amounts to $2,643 in interest... so let's subtract $2,400 to account for 1 payment? Lease buyout around $48,649... maybe a bit less if my assumption of "rent" calculation is off. But this still doesn't beat outright purchasing?
They then tried showing me an employee's son who leased a GT2 Stinger. Here's his lease stats and current payoff, and they tried saying this was a good example of how it doesn't make sense.
Contract date: 12/16/18
MSRP: $54,280, selling price $50,461
Rebate: $6,500
Net cap cost: $44,546
Money down: $3,000
Residual: $28,207
Monthly payment: $595
Buyout as of today?: $40,078 (plus 6.75% tax)... does their argument make any sense? Did he pay $5,355 in payments + $3,000 down on a $44,546 deal, but would have to pay nearly $43,000 incl. tax to pay off the lease? I'm sure it's different because he got worse lease cash, but is that all?
"Nobody would buy a car if lease buyouts worked"
"Lease cash is not the same as a rebate... they use it to work the numbers in different ways"
"XXX's son leased a GT2 Stinger 10 months ago - look how large his payoff still is"
"You'll end up paying a lot more doing the lease. I don't want to sell you the car if that's the route you want to take."
"We pay the invoice price and can't discount below that on a lease"
"You have a high value trade & lots of equity... buying is better for you" (maybe this is true?)
They are giving me $47K trade allowance on which I owe $19,342. If anyone can please tell me what my better deal is... if buying is actually better than the lease option, or if this dealer is full of crap, please let me know. I tried posting pictures, but can't at this time.
Lease---
MSRP: $54,435
Invoice: $51,679 (selling price of car - they seemed firm on this, not going below invoice)
$10,200 lease cash + $400 military cash
Cap cost: $41,079
MF .00263, 24mo./12k mi., residual: $28,850/70.25%
$2,657.33 down
$708.02/mo lease payment
Buyout info they used detailed further down
Purchasing instead of leasing---
$49,935 selling price (maybe more wiggle room as they offered me maybe $15K or $16K OTD before I left)
$2,750 KMF rebate, $2,000 loyalty rebate, $400 military rebate: $5,150 total rebates
Vehicle total after rebates: $45,283 incl. the little bit of fees & tax
($3,173 in tax savings from the trade worth mentioning)
Balance due: $17,626 (but again, they may go down to $15K or $16K)
Their explanation for why this is a bad idea---
They used an example of making 3 payments! before buying out the lease. Fine, whatever.
~$2,100 in payments + ~$2,700 down = ~$4,800 paid before buyout (their math)
$28,850.55 (residual value) + $300 buyout fee = $29,150.55
$29,150+$14,175 (21 months of $670 payments - apparently he thinks each payment is only ~$30 savings in rent/interest) - this is probably where they went wrong.
=$43,325 + taxes = $46,249 (they said Ohio doesn't tax credit trade for lease, but the Ohio tax website mentions they do, just not how?)
$46,249 + ~$4,800 (from earlier, paid before the buyout as payments & money down)
Grand lease buyout total of $51,049 vs $45,283 to purchase outright... but let's assume their "rent" savings was off. I'm not sure how this figure should be calculated, but using $44,000 as the rough "loan" amount over 24 months at 5.664% amounts to $2,643 in interest... so let's subtract $2,400 to account for 1 payment? Lease buyout around $48,649... maybe a bit less if my assumption of "rent" calculation is off. But this still doesn't beat outright purchasing?
They then tried showing me an employee's son who leased a GT2 Stinger. Here's his lease stats and current payoff, and they tried saying this was a good example of how it doesn't make sense.
Contract date: 12/16/18
MSRP: $54,280, selling price $50,461
Rebate: $6,500
Net cap cost: $44,546
Money down: $3,000
Residual: $28,207
Monthly payment: $595
Buyout as of today?: $40,078 (plus 6.75% tax)... does their argument make any sense? Did he pay $5,355 in payments + $3,000 down on a $44,546 deal, but would have to pay nearly $43,000 incl. tax to pay off the lease? I'm sure it's different because he got worse lease cash, but is that all?