Kia Stinger vs Scat Pack Charger and Challenger

Maljey

Active Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2021
Messages
333
Reaction score
273
Points
68
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
All vehicles stock. Not really surpised with the results, given that the Scat Packs have 100+ more hp and tq. Stinger pretty close though!

 
How, is he a horrible driver? He's just putting the car in a mode and stomping on it: and the contenders are doing the same: letting the differences in the cars reveal themselves. Of course, a "good launch" counts for something, but that's why they do three in each mode (at least in the Stinger vs Audi S5 video they did).
 
______________________________

good one with the charger rt
 
That guys videos are sooo bad. He is a horrible driver. He should be reviewing staplers.
I picked up on the amateurish wiff as well. Maybe it's just because he looks like a doofus. I'm not above making snap judgments.
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
The 392 is one thing.

A 5.7 gets dragged by a Stinger. Dig or roll.
 
The 392 is one thing.

A 5.7 gets dragged by a Stinger. Dig or roll.
if you catch a Scat sleeping, you got him until close to triple digits (takes a minute for that V8 to move all that ass....LOL). After that, let it go unless you have a little "magic" under the hood...of course, PLEASE be on a track.

5.7 just doesn't have enough bricks in it's pocket...LOL
 
These 'drag' videos are all exhibition. The biggest variable introduced here is reaction time, which has NOTHING to do with the car. By design these videos are flawed. The testing methodology introduces a host of variables into the race, which is the exact opposite of what proper scientific measure sets out to achieve. But running the car solo numerous times in several conditions makes for boring entertainment, so we get these next to worthless videos.

Comparing stats on paper done by professionals will tell anyone how their car potentially matches up, the rest is up to the drivers and conditions (neither again have anything to do with the vehicle).
 
These 'drag' videos are all exhibition. The biggest variable introduced here is reaction time, which has NOTHING to do with the car. By design these videos are flawed. The testing methodology introduces a host of variables into the race, which is the exact opposite of what proper scientific measure sets out to achieve. But running the car solo numerous times in several conditions makes for boring entertainment, so we get these next to worthless videos.

Comparing stats on paper done by professionals will tell anyone how their car potentially matches up, the rest is up to the drivers and conditions (neither again have anything to do with the vehicle).
Best place for all that info is the strip not the street. At least on the strip, men/women will be men/women and boys/girls will be boys/girls.......regardless of vehicle
 
Back
Top